What was the black death

Health related question in topics Conditions Illness Definitions History .We found some answers as below for this question “What was the black death”,you can compare them.

The Black Death is the name for the plague that swept through Europe from 1347 to 1351 killing about 25 million people ChaCha! [ Source: http://www.chacha.com/question/what-was-the-black-death ]
More Answers to “What was the black death
The Black Death was very dangerous and contagious and destroyed 2/3’s of Europe’s population and it killed people in a strange manner. People who weren’t affected went crazy in fear of catching it and the people who caught it usually died w…
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_was_the_Black_Death
the black death was a vicious plague that took over in the… um i think 1700’s?? and it was carried by rodents- mostly rats… it used to take over peoples bodies (rats bit them) they would get a fever, libs would rot a fall off and a s…
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081123132457AAoC4Xx
It was a plague of some kind of horrendous ilness that swept through Europe in about 1330-1350. It may be that there were several diseases associated with the Black Death and Great plagues. Anthrax, is a leading alternative candidate. But m…
http://www.blurtit.com/q103754.html

Related Questions Answered on Y!Answers

How did the black death alter europe?
Q: How did the Black Death alter Europe and what of this had to do with economic changes that were happening at the time, what were these changes?Thanks
A: “The plague did more than just devastate the medieval population; it caused a substantial change in economy and society in all areas of the world. Economic historians like Fernand Braudel have concluded that Black Death exacerbated a recession in the European economy that had been under way since the beginning of the century. As a consequence, social and economic change greatly accelerated during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. The church’s power was weakened, and in some cases, the social roles it had played were taken over by secular groups. Also the plague led to peasant uprisings in many parts of Europe, such as France (the Jacquerie rebellion), Italy (the Ciompi rebellion, which swept the city of Florence), and in England (the English Peasant Revolt).Europe had been overpopulated before the plague, and a reduction of 30% to 50% of the population could have resulted in higher wages and more available land and food for peasants because of less competition for resources. However, for reasons that are still debated, population levels declined after the Black Death’s first outbreak until around 1420 and did not begin to rise again until 1470, so the initial Black Death event on its own does not entirely provide a satisfactory explanation to this extended period of decline in prosperity. See Medieval demography for a more complete treatment of this issue and current theories on why improvements in living standards took longer to evolve.The great population loss brought economic changes based on increased social mobility, as depopulation further eroded the peasants’ already weakened obligations to remain on their traditional holdings. In the wake of the drastic population decline brought on by the plague, authorities in Western Europe worked to maintain social order through instituting wage controls.[69] These governmental controls were set in place to ensure that workers received the same salary post-plague as they had before the onslaught of the Black Death.[70] Within England, for example, the Ordinance of Labourers, created in 1349, and the Statute of Labourers, created in 1351, restricted both wage increases and the relocation of workers.[71] If workers attempted to leave their current post, employers were given the right to have them imprisoned.[72] The Statute was strictly enforced in some areas. For example, 7,556 people in Essex County were fined for deviating from the Statute in 1352.[73] However, despite examples such as Essex County, the Statute quickly proved to be difficult to enforce due to the scarcity of labour.In Western Europe, the sudden shortage of cheap labour provided an incentive for landlords to compete for peasants with wages and freedoms, an innovation that, some argue, represents the roots of capitalism, and the resulting social upheaval “caused” the Renaissance, and even the Reformation. In many ways the Black Death and its aftermath improved the situation of surviving peasants, notably by the end of the 15th century. In Western Europe, labourers gained more power and were more in demand because of the shortage of labour. In gaining more power, workers following the Black Death often moved away from annual contracts in favour of taking on successive temporary jobs that offered higher wages.[74] Workers such as servants now had the opportunity to leave their current employment to seek better-paying, more attractive positions in areas previous off limits to them.[75] Another positive aspect of the period was that there was more fertile land available to the population; however, the benefits would not be fully realized until 1470, nearly 120 years later, when overall population levels finally began to rise again.Social mobility as result of the Black Death has been postulated as the most likely cause of the Great Vowel Shift, which is the principal reason why the spelling system in English today no longer reflects its pronunciation.In Eastern Europe, by contrast, renewed stringency of laws tied the remaining peasant population more tightly to the land than ever before through serfdom. Sparsely populated Eastern Europe was less affected by the Black Death and so peasant revolts were less common in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, not occurring in the east until the sixteenth through nineteenth centuries. Since it is believed to have in part caused the social upheavals of fourteenth- and fifteenth-century Western Europe, some see the Black Death as a factor in the Renaissance and even the Reformation in Western Europe. Therefore, historians have cited the smaller impact of the plague as a contributing factor in Eastern Europe’s failure to experience either of these movements on a similar scale. Extrapolating from this, the Black Death may be seen as partly responsible for Eastern Europe’s considerable lag in scientific and philosophical advances as well as in the move to liberalise government by restricting the power of the monarch and aristocracy. A common example is that England is seen to have effectively ended serfdom by 1550 while moving towards more representative government; meanwhile, Russia did not abolish serfdom until an autocratic tsar decreed so in 1861.Furthermore, the plague’s great population reduction brought cheaper land prices, more food for the average peasant, and a relatively large increase in per capita income among the peasantry, if not immediately, in the coming century. Since the plague left vast areas of farmland untended, they were made available for pasture and put more meat on the market; the consumption of meat and dairy products went up, as did the export of beef and butter from the Low Countries, Scandinavia and northern Germany. However, the upper class often attempted to stop these changes, initially in Western Europe, and more forcefully and successfully in Eastern Europe, by instituting sumptuary laws. These regulated what people (particularly of the peasant class) could wear, so that nobles could ensure that peasants did not begin to dress and act as a higher class member with their increased wealth. Another tactic was to fix prices and wages so that peasants could not demand more with increasing value. This was met with varying success depending on the amount of rebellion it inspired; such a law was one of the causes of the 1381 Peasants’ Revolt in England.”
How are the Black Death and the Bubonic Plague two different things?
Q: As a history B.A., I should know this but I keep getting the two confused. I know from a medical standpoint that these two things are different.How are the Black Death and the Bubonic Plague two different things? I am aware that the Bubonic Plague was a result of the transmission of “yersinia pestis” to the known world (at the time anyway).Thanks for clarifying this for me.
A: Well, the above answer is sort of correct. The Black Death refers to the plague which swept Europe from 1347 to 1351, killing an estimated 200 million people in 1347 alone.Plague refers to Yersinia Pestis, in the Bubonic, Pnuemonic, and Septicemic forms known to science today.There was a study done in 2002 that seemed to show that the Black death may not have been Plague, specifically because of the lack of rat population die-off, and because of the speed of transmission. Not all the experts agree, however.See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1925513.stmAlso, the BBC History Series has a great set of articles about the Black Death at http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/middle_ages/black_01.shtmlThis has interested me over the last 40 years because as a young Army Medic in Vietnam I was with a unit that encountered Plague infecting human beings. It was a real wake up call to learn that this medieval killer was still a modern day problem.
What did people in medieval times think caused the black death?
Q: What did people in medieval times (during the black death/bubonic plague) think caused the black death/bubonic plague? Links to articles and websites would be great.
A: MOst did not know. Remember, medicine is a realitvely new idea.They finally put it together and started killing off the rats.
People also view

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *