Home > FLU >

Is there still a swine flu threat

Health related question in topics Conditions Illness .We found some answers as below for this question “Is there still a swine flu threat”,you can compare them.

Yes, there is still a Swine Flu threat. It is not as wide spread as it was at one time but the threat is still there. ChaCha! [ Source: http://www.chacha.com/question/is-there-still-a-swine-flu-threat ]
More Answers to “Is there still a swine flu threat
Is swine flu still a threat?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100112040421AANUFQ7
its died down , but the next wave of it , which is going to be more powerful then the 1st two , is just around the corner.. anyone who hasnt gotten vaccinated should probably do so now. hopefully its not stronger like they intend it to be…
Is The Swine Flu Still A Huge Threat To Your Family??
http://greatmarriagetips.blogspot.com/2009/05/is-swine-flu-still-huge-threat-to-your.html
On Thursday, the World Health Organization said that up to 2 billion people could become infected by the swine flu if the current outbreak turns into a pandemic. WHO flu chief Keiji Fukuda startled the world media when he told them this: “…
Was swine flu ever a real threat?
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health/swine+ever+real+threat/2520743/story.html
It’s been a good week for drug companies and an even better one for conspiracy theorists. Last week, angered by the bumper rise in profits being reported by vaccine manufacturers as the incidence of swine flu plummets, the former head of …

Related Questions Answered on Y!Answers

News Media Headline says: Swine flu may be less potent than first feared????
Q: In ref to:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090501/ap_on_he_me/med_swine_fluThe new flu may be less potent than first feared BY WHOM? This week has had the news media spreading unwarranted fear and panic?For example, just yesterday (see: http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/04/30/swine.flu/ ):article: “Swine flu is a contagious respiratory disease that affects pigs and can jump to humans. Symptoms include fever, runny nose, sore throat, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea.”–but those symptoms are no different than any other type A influenza virus.”But the latest virus is a hybrid of swine, avian and human strains, and no vaccine has been developed for it. In response, countries are scrambling to prevent its spread.”–but people contract mutated versions of the flu virus every year, most do not get the latest vaccine, and most still recover after a few days. Those strains can also be hybrids of human, bird, and pig. It just sounds more “scary” to keep emphasizing a hybrid trio. Because swine flu (which has shown to pose no greater threat than other flu viruses) developed in pigs doesn’t make it more dangerous to humans. It has been proven that your immune system is the most important element when fighting the flu, which is why MDs will tell you to get plenty of rest. It’s why the same group that has always been most at risk is still most at risk: babies, the elderly, and those with weakened immune systems. But this is nothing new. Plus, vaccines are not 100% effective and can actually cause illness (as was the case in 1976 when 40 million were given flu vaccine and some developed Guillain-Barre syndrome, a severe and sometimes fatal condition).”The World Health Organization raised its pandemic to its second-highest level, warning of widespread human infection from the outbreak that originated in Mexico and has been jumping from person-to-person with relative ease.”–“jumping from person-to-person with relative ease” is nothing more than a news media sensationalistic style of saying that the virus can pass from human to human, which is how most people who get infected with type A influenza have always gotten infected anyway. This is not a “superflu” virus that has proven to be extra contagious or extra difficult for someone to get over compared to any other flu-related illness. “It urged countries to ramp up efforts to produce a vaccine.”–Why? And WHAT countries? Thousands die from flu related illness every year and nobody “ramps up efforts” to create a vaccine. There’s no real reason being demonstrated why a new vaccine is so imperative even if there have been fatalities (curiously all in Mexico except for one boy who the article admits had underlying health problems). Again, there is no evidence that this is some kind of strain of flu that the human immune system cannot handle regardless of what kind of “hybrid” combination. The swine flu pathogen is not from a human source and still does not kill people at an alarming rate.”It really is all of humanity that is under threat during a pandemic,” said Dr. Margaret Chan, the WHO’s director-general. “We do not have all the answers right now, but we will get them.”–“all of humanity is under threat” sounds like now the WHO is adding to media hype, but the point here is that she says “during a pandemic,” and there has yet to be a pandemic declared (defined as the disease occurring throughout wide geographic location and affecting much of the population). This kind of language makes me suspect that if the World Health Organization declares there’s a pandemic it won’t be because of an actual threat but for some other politically motivated reason.”By early Thursday, the WHO had confirmed 154 cases worldwide with 10 additional cases reported in Spain, Nine of the cases of the H1N1 virus in Spain were found in people who had returned from Mexico.”–How in the name of the seven mad gods that rule the sea is 154 cases of any flu virus an overwhelming imminent threat of pandemic when as much as 500,000 people on average per year are expected to die from flu-related illness and nobody ever declares a pandemic has occurred? “While all the fatalities, except that of the boy, have been in Mexico — the epicenter of the outbreak — the majority of the confirmed infected cases have been in the United States: 91 across 10 states, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).”–In all cases except one baby boy with underlying health problems, those infected with the new flu strain got typical flu symptoms, not some bizarre never before seen reaction to the flu virus, and they got over it like any other influenza. So, why is it so important these 91 cases were the new strain of virus when probably thousands more contracted other strains of type A influenza, had similar symptoms, and most recovered just the same?Again, my question is: The new flu may be less potent than first feared BY WHOM?
A: Quite true. The media have been tripping over each other to write this up like it’s the apocalypse. There’s never been any evidence that’s suggested it’s particularly dangerous.I don’t mind the precautions the government have been taking but it’s a sad indictment on the state of our media that there’s hardly any sane, informed reporting. They’ve become so used to innuendo & partisanship they’ve forgotten what real reporting is.
Talking Back to the News Media: What am I not getting about the panic over swine flu?
Q: in ref. to the news article:http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/04/30/swine.flu/I know this is a lot, but am I NOT understanding all this correctly:article: “Swine flu is a contagious respiratory disease that affects pigs and can jump to humans. Symptoms include fever, runny nose, sore throat, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea.”–but those symptoms are no different than any other type A influenza virus.”But the latest virus is a hybrid of swine, avian and human strains, and no vaccine has been developed for it. In response, countries are scrambling to prevent its spread.”–but people contract mutated versions of the flu virus every year, most do not get the latest vaccine, and most still recover after a few days. Those strains can also be hybrids of human, bird, and pig. It just sounds more “scary” to keep emphasizing a hybrid trio. Because swine flu (which has shown to pose no greater threat than other flu viruses) developed in pigs doesn’t make it more dangerous to humans. It has been proven that your immune system is the most important element when fighting the flu, which is why MDs will tell you to get plenty of rest. It’s why the same group that has always been most at risk is still most at risk: babies, the elderly, and those with weakened immune systems. But this is nothing new. Plus, vaccines are not 100% effective and can actually cause illness (as was the case in 1976 when 40 million were given flu vaccine and some developed Guillain-Barre syndrome, a severe and sometimes fatal condition).”The World Health Organization raised its pandemic to its second-highest level, warning of widespread human infection from the outbreak that originated in Mexico and has been jumping from person-to-person with relative ease.”–“jumping from person-to-person with relative ease” is nothing more than a news media sensationalistic style of saying that the virus can pass from human to human, which is how most people who get infected with type A influenza have always gotten infected anyway. This is not a “superflu” virus that has proven to be extra contagious or extra difficult for someone to get over compared to any other flu-related illness. “It urged countries to ramp up efforts to produce a vaccine.”–Why? And WHAT countries? Thousands die from flu related illness every year and nobody “ramps up efforts” to create a vaccine. There’s no real reason being demonstrated why a new vaccine is so imperative even if there have been fatalities (curiously all in Mexico except for one boy who the article admits had underlying health problems). Again, there is no evidence that this is some kind of strain of flu that the human immune system cannot handle regardles of what kind of “hybrid” combination. The swine flu pathogen is not from a human source and still does not kill people at an alarming rate.”It really is all of humanity that is under threat during a pandemic,” said Dr. Margaret Chan, the WHO’s director-general. “We do not have all the answers right now, but we will get them.”–“all of humanity is under threat” sounds like now the WHO is adding to media hype, but the point here is that she says “during a pandemic,” and there has yet to be a pandemic declared (defined as the disease occurring throughout wide geographic location and affecting much of the population). This kind of language makes me suspect that if the World Health Organization declares there’s a pandemic it won’t be because of an actual threat but for some other politically motivated reason.”By early Thursday, the WHO had confirmed 154 cases worldwide with 10 additional cases reported in Spain, Nine of the cases of the H1N1 virus in Spain were found in people who had returned from Mexico.”–How in the name of the seven mad gods that rule the sea is 154 cases of any flu virus an overwhelming imminent threat of pandemic when as much as 500,000 people on average per year are expected to die from flu-related illness and nobody ever declares a pandemic has occurred? “While all the fatalities, except that of the boy, have been in Mexico — the epicenter of the outbreak — the majority of the confirmed infected cases have been in the United States: 91 across 10 states, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).”–In all cases except one baby boy with underlying health problems, those infected with the new flu strain got typical flu symptoms, not some bizarre never before seen reaction to the flu virus, and they got over it like any other influenza. So, why is it so important these 91 cases were the new strain of virus when probably thousands more contracted other strains of type A influenza, had similar symptoms, and most recovered just the same?The news media is going to great lengths to literally tell people they should be worried. The WHO is using language like “all of humanity” is under an imminent “threat.” Am I mis-reading what I’ve indicated above when you sift through the a
A: Your post has been the ONLY dissection and exposure of the unwarranted hysteria perpetrated on the people by the media and the government. Everyone should read what you have written.You are one of the few people out there with any sense. Thank you for your voice of sanity in a world of madness.I would expound on my answer, but I have to go pick up my asthmatic son from public school, where I have allowed him to attend, despite being surrounded by possible flu carriers, WITHOUT a surgical mask!:OAnd we live in TEXAS!! GASP!
We agree that there are all kinds of terror threats? Where are your thoughts on this ‘swine flu’ outbreak?
Q: ~~Is it at all possible that someone or ones decided on still another form of terrorism?What bothers me is that the CDC has strains of every single type of virus ~~and then some not as yet identified or categorized~~and then of course, there are the quiet and forgotten scientists who are forever linking or creating ..and there are others, who may have something even more sinister up their sleeves.What do you think?Keeping in mind that there are all kinds of terrorist acts~~~~and is our government equipped for what may become a pandemic?hummI’m not in a frenzy. And I don’t watch tv that much. And I can ask a question such as this whenever I care to. Don’t be so quick to assume why people ask certain questions. I don’t always trust government ~` any government.You understand of course.
A: Test Run.
People also view

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *