Home > Health > Drugs >

How harmful is lsd

Health related question in topics Addiction Drug Abuse Recreation .We found some answers as below for this question "How harmful is lsd",you can compare them.

LSD may release latent psychosis or exacerbate depression, leading to irrational behavior. It can lead to dangerous behavior. [ Source: http://www.chacha.com/question/how-harmful-is-lsd ]
More Answers to "How harmful is lsd"
What is LSD?
http://www.ehow.com/facts_5409320_lsd-drug.html
LSD is made from lysergic acid. It can be found in the form of a tablet, capsule, liquid or on absorbent paper.
LSD - (No Propaganda) - Is it harmful?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080104041518AARzjkG&show=7
Look at Wiki - it tells you how the active ingredient has dropped over the years. I wouldn't touch it now. You can get the odd bad trip which is pretty nasty - though I have never experienced one. The worst effect imho is the flashbacks. Im...
What do you know about LSD?
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_do_you_know_about_LSD
LSD is a psychedelic drug that affects the colors behind your eyes. it makes you trip.

Related Questions Answered on Y!Answers

Is there any harmful effects with mixing LSD and Propecia?
Q: I plan on trying LSD with a friend, but I take Propecia. Would there be any harm in taking LSD while taking Propecia?
A: If you were only allowed to own one car in your entire lifetime would you trash it, or would you take very good care of it and make it last?You only get one body, why are trashing it? A third grader should be able to logic better than you. Duh
Is it harmful to try LSD once? Will there be a difference in the way i am now compared to the time after?
Q: Will there be a difference in personality compared to before and after the drug has been taken?
A: LSD is actually one of the safer drugs out there (including ETOH). It has an LD50 of 45 grams in mice, for christ sake! LSD Flashbacks are a myth, too. LSD leaves your system within the first few days, leaving few ill effects.The only medical problem caused by LSD is the onset of pre-existing mental problems in the user. If you have a family history of major mental disorders (e.i. schizophrenia, Bipoler, etc) I would be careful about taking LSD in high doses.Read up on it. I'll leave a good link for you to follow up with.
Alcohol, tobacco more harmful than cannabis, LSD, ecstasy: study. Thoughts?
Q: Alcohol is nearly as harmful as heroin and tobacco is more dangerous than cannabis, LSD or ecstasy, according to a new classification table of drugs published in The Lancet medical journal Friday.The table, drawn up by a group of leading British scientists, ranked heroin, cocaine, barbiturates and street methadone as the most harmful drugs, closely followed by alcohol in fifth place.Tobacco was assessed to be the ninth most dangerous drug behind ketamine -- commonly used as a horse tranquilizer -- benzodiazepines, which are prescription tranquillisers, and amphetamines.Cannabis was said to be the 11th most harmful. LSD was ranked 14th and so-called "clubbers' drug" ecstasy in 18th, or third last, place.The classifications were based on individual drugs' so-called "harm scores" -- the physical damage to the user; how likely the drug was to induce dependency; and the effect of its use on families, communities and society.Each of the three categories was split into nine categories of risk and independent experts including psychiatrists, chemists and forensic scientists ranked each category on a scale from 0 ("no risk") to 3 ("extreme risk").Heroin scored 2.7 on the harm scale with alcohol just under 2. Tobacco scored 1.7 and ecstasy scored just over 1.1.One of the scientists, Professor Colin Blakemore, the chief executive of the government-funded public health body the Medical Research Council, said their findings differed markedly from the existing drugs classification in Britain."Alcohol and tobacco are way up there in the league table, with alcohol being not very far behind demonised terrors of the street like heroin," he said.His colleague, Professor David Nutt, from the University of Bristol, western England, said isolated cases of unpleasant and unpredictable responses to drugs were allowed to dictate policy."A more scientific view is that these risks have to be assessed against their effect on the whole population," he added.Possessing Class A drugs like heroin, cocaine and crack, ecstasy and LSD currently carries a maximum seven-year prison sentence; cannabis is a Class C drug, while alcohol and tobacco are unclassified.Blakemore said he hoped policy makers would "take note" that their table differed substantially from the official classification, which a separate British study published on March 8 also criticised as inadequate.The RSA Commission on Illegal Drugs, Communities and Public Policy said Britain's drug laws should be replaced by a system recognising the harm to health of substances like alcohol and tobacco rather than crime prevention.The study that was done developed a new classification system for drugs. It's designed to be a more scientific and evidence-based system of classifying drugs then the current system used in the UK which is arbitrary and has little scientific basis.this is the summary from the study:Drug misuse and abuse are major health problems. Harmful drugs are regulated according to classification systems that purport to relate to the harms and risks of each drug. However, the methodology and processes underlying classification systems are generally neither specified nor transparent, which reduces confidence in their accuracy and undermines health education messages. We developed and explored the feasibility of the use of a nine-category matrix of harm, with an expert delphic procedure, to assess the harms of a range of illicit drugs in an evidence-based fashion. We also included five legal drugs of misuse (alcohol, khat, solvents, alkyl nitrites, and tobacco) and one that has since been classified (ketamine) for reference. The process proved practicable, and yielded roughly similar scores and rankings of drug harm when used by two separate groups of experts. The ranking of drugs produced by our assessment of harm differed from those use
A: You can find a study that proves anything you want. And if the study is from any sort of advocacy organization - you can guarantee that they got the results they wanted.Always suspect studies published by an advocacy group.
TOP


Prev Question: How long does it take for someone to become addicted to smoking cigarettes
Next Question:

People also view
  • How harmful is lsd
  • What does D A R E stand for
  • How long does it take for someone to become addicted to smoking cigarettes
  • Can you overdose on oxy
  • Is weed fun to smoke
  • How can I get crunk
  • Can it make you feel scared
  • Can you use regular charcoal on a hookah
  • What will make your trip better on shrooms
  • How did weed get discovered