How does asbestos damage lungs
Type of lung disease that is linked to asbestos exposure involves the lining of the lungs, called the pleura ChaCha! [ Source: http://www.chacha.com/question/how-does-asbestos-damage-lungs ]
More Answers to "How does asbestos damage lungs"
- Can One Time Exposure of Asbestos Damage Lungs?
- At work the other day we had to take two ceiling tiles out and there was dust everywhere even the corridor was dusty. I was only in there about ten minutes. Anyway I’ve since found out they had asbestos in them. Since then I’ve had a sore t...
- Is it true that asbestos dust can damage your lungs??
- Yes, if exposure to asbestos in the air is long enough and the airborne levels are high enough, eventually lung diseases such as asbestosis and lung cancer can result.
Related Questions Answered on Y!Answers
- Wondering about fiberglass, and asbestos?
- Q: For about a week i worked with my friends dad fixing up an old house. i removed old insulation, and put new insulation in. i was wondering if this short amount of time working with insulation had any effect on my lungs. At another time i spent probably 10 hours total stripping and handling asbestos wire with intent to sell it to a scrap yard. i was unaware that it could cause damage until a friend of my dads told me. how much damage do you think that did? i am wondering all of this because cross country running season is starting soon, and i am looking for ways to increase lung capacity, and strengthen my lungs, is there any way to repair the damage done?thankss :]i wasent wearing a mask because i diden tknow it was harmful at the time
- A: This is very little exposure to be worried. The diseases develop after years of exposure. You would know if you were sick because you would develop shortness of breath while doing even simple things, and your lungs would be filling up with fluid from infection or blood in more severe cases.
- Business Ethics - Homework help!!?
- Q: This is the assignment, but I have no idea how I'm supposed to answer this ...The Johns-Manville Corporation was a profitable company that made a variety of building and other products. It was a major producer of asbestos, which was used for insulation in buildings and for a variety of other uses. It has been medically proven that excessive exposure to asbestos causes asbestosis, a fatal lung disease. Thousands of employees of the company and consumers who were exposed to asbestos and contracted this fatal disease sued the company for damages. In 1983, the lawsuits were being filed at a rate of more than 400 per week. As a response, the company filed for reorganization bankruptcy. It argued that if it did not, an otherwise viable company that provided thousands of jobs an served a useful purpose in this country would be distroyed, and that without the declaration of bankruptcy, a few of the plaintiffs who first filed their lawsuits would win awards of hundreds of ..read below.dollars, leaving nothing for the reaminder of the plaintiffs. Under the bankruptcy court's protection, the company was restructed to survive. As part of the release from bankruptcy, the company contributed money to a fund to pay current and future claimants. The fund is not large enough to pay all injured persons the full amount of their claims. Was it ethical for Johns-Manville to declare bankruptcy? Did it meet its duty of social responsibility in this case? If you were a member of the board of irectors of the company, would you have voted to place the company in bankruptcy? Why or why not?I am very confused about this assignment and have no clue how to answer it.
- A: the company does not exist to make the public rich, it exists to make it's shareholders money and in that capacity, it was obligated ethically to do whatever it took to remain viable
Prev Question: What was the african contribution to the columbian exchange
People also view